Watch four analysts argue your next trade.
Four LLM analysts debate any ticker, then hand you a BUY, HOLD, or SELL with the full transcript.
Improving fundamentals outweigh near-term sentiment risk. Entry 178 to 180, stop 173.50, first target 188. Full rationale and transcript attached.
Research, not advice
Every run is documented analysis with sources, never a recommendation to buy or sell.
Open foundations
Built on TauricResearch / TradingAgents, an open-source multi-agent framework.
Free to start
Three runs every month at no cost, and no card required to begin.
How a run works.
Every run follows the same sequence. Each step happens in order, and you can watch it happen.
- 01
Pick a ticker and a date.
AAPL on 2026-05-31, NVDA on the day of earnings, anything listed. Choose the model tier and how deep the debate should go.
- 02
Watch the analyst team debate live.
Four analysts file reports in parallel. A bull and a bear take opposing positions. A trader drafts a plan. A risk team pushes back. You see every turn as it streams.
- 03
Receive a structured decision.
BUY, HOLD, or SELL with confidence, a written rationale, and the full transcript saved to your history. About five minutes on the fast profile, ten on deep.
Inside the desk.
Twelve agents work one ticker in three stages. Every report and rebuttal is saved to the transcript.
Four analysts open the case.
Fundamentals, news, sentiment, and technicals each read the ticker independently and file a written report with its sources.
See a sample runBalance sheet & valuation
Catalysts & headlines
Crowd positioning
Price structure & momentum
The 12-agent desk
An institutional research desk for every trader.
Type a ticker. Twelve AI analysts pull real SEC filings and argue it out — bulls, bears, a risk committee, a portfolio manager. You walk away with a BUY, HOLD, or SELL you can actually defend, plus the plan. Research, not advice.
Discovery
Find high-conviction ideas instantly. The Alpha Radar ranks what's decisively moving now — by conviction and next-day odds — or deep-search any US ticker.
The adversarial debate
In the War Room, four analysts file reports from real 10-K / 10-Q filings. A bull argues the upside; a bear hunts the red flags it missed. A research manager synthesises; a three-person risk committee stress-tests the trade.
The decision
A portfolio manager weighs it all into an Executive Verdict — BUY / HOLD / SELL with a confidence level and a three-bullet rationale — plus an Execution Blueprint: entry zone, stop, and target.
Proof & output
Export an institutional PDF dossier — the full debate, verdict, and blueprint — to keep or share. Shareable run links prove your analysis pre-dated the move.
The desk — twelve specialists
Each reasons in the style of a legendary investor, and they are built to disagree.
Ground-truth SEC filings
10-K / 10-Q
Analysts
Fundamentals
value & moat
News
catalysts
Sentiment
crowd
Technical
price & trend
Adversarial debate
Bull
argues the upside
Bear
hunts red flags
Research manager
synthesises the debate
Risk committee + trader
Aggressive
risk
Conservative
risk
Neutral
risk
Trader
execution blueprint
Portfolio manager
issues the verdict
Executive verdict
Adversarial by design
Because a dedicated bear argues the same filings, structural risks — inventory bloat, dilution, debt — surface before you trade, not after.
The Influence Matrix
See exactly which analysts drove the call — an honest desk-lean, not a black box. When a SELL lands despite an up-move, you see who tipped it.
Sourced, not vibes
Every point traces to real SEC data. Twelve agents arguing over ground truth catch each other's mistakes — the reasoning is the product.
Inside every dossier
The institutional tear sheet Quant users download for a completed run.
- The full adversarial debate transcript
- Executive Verdict — BUY / HOLD / SELL, confidence, 3-bullet rationale
- Execution Blueprint — entry zone, stop-loss, target
- The Influence Matrix — which analysts drove the call
- Sourced SEC data points (debt, inventory, dilution)
- “Research, not investment advice” footer + generation date
Institutional quality, retail price.
Professional-grade research and tear sheets for a fraction of the cost of a CFA or a Bloomberg seat — from €0 to €99 a month, with per-run credits, instant top-ups, and refunds on inconclusive runs.
Research, not investment advice.
Watch every turn as it streams.
No black box. Four analysts file in parallel, a bull and a bear trade rebuttals, and the desk only calls it once all twelve agents have reported.
See a sample runSample replay. Real runs take about five to ten minutes.
What you actually receive.
Every run produces eight artifacts. They stay in your run history, exportable, with timestamps and the exact prompts used.
Analyst reports
Fundamentals
Revenue growth 8.2% YoY. Gross margin 46.1%. Free cash flow ahead of consensus by 4.3%.
News
12 stories scored. Two material: supplier contract extension, antitrust filing in EU.
Sentiment
Reddit and X sentiment net positive. Institutional flow neutral. Options skew bearish 30D.
Technicals
Above 50D and 200D MA. RSI 62. MACD flat. Resistance at 184.20.
Debate and plan
Bull vs. bear debate
Bull: pricing power intact. Bear: channel checks softening. Three exchanges, transcript saved.
Trader plan
Entry zone 178-180. Stop 173.50. First target 188. Position size 1.2% of book.
Risk team review
Aggressive: lean in. Conservative: halve size. Neutral: hold to plan. Vote logged.
Final decision
BUY · 0.71Improving fundamentals outweigh near-term sentiment risk. Full rationale and the complete transcript travel with the decision.
Sample output, not a live run.
Pricing.
See full pricing →Runs are metered in credits and you are only charged when a run completes. Pricing is provisional during beta.
Pro
most chosen- Credits
- 20 credits per month
- Models
- Sonnet 4.6, GPT mini, Gemini Flash
Put your next idea through the desk.
Run a full multi-agent debate on any ticker in minutes. Three runs a month are free, no card required.